PEPIS 2001 archive - Power Elite Public Information Service (2024)

PEPIS98 | PEPIS99| PEPIS00 | PEPIS01 |PEPIS02

PEPIS #34 - 31Dec01 - Possible Futures: Nuclear War in Kashmir
PEPIS #33 - 31Oct01 - The USA: Most Terrorist State in the World
PEPIS #32 - 16Aug01 - Sole Pre-Bilderberg Source Closed Down
PEPIS #31 - 03Jul01 - Lawyers demand removal of Swedish article
PEPIS #30 - 05Jun01 - Bilderberg participants 2001
PEPIS #29 - 25May01 - Bilderberg (Reuters)
PEPIS #28 - 19May01 - Bilderberg 2001 Conference update
PEPIS #27 - 08Apr01 - Bilderberg 2001 to take place in Sweden?
PEPIS #26 - 08Mar01 - 'Imagine Yourselves to be Dictators of Europe'

Not a whisper from the Bilderbergers recently, but that's no reason to notsend out a PEPIS email is it? Maybe our Bilder-buddies are too busy throwingmoney at anyone who'll help them persuade UK public and politicians to acceptthe European Central Currency? A difficult job because Titus Alexander'stweeking of the pound would be somewhat more sensible. And most people wiselydistrust bankers when they tell us what we should be doing with our money.

Tony

http://www.bilderberg.org

----------------------------------------------------------

IN THIS BULLETIN
1. Victor Rothschild implicated in knobbling of BBC
2. Possible Futures: Nuclear War in Kashmir
3. Proposed amendment to the UK Budget bill
4. On the SWP: For spooks eyes only - CIA, MOSSAD and MI6
5. Who's to blame for US foreign policy?
6. Kissinger War Crimes trial latest

----------------------------------------------------------

Best book of 2001?
Without doubt Chris Hitchens' 'The Trial of Henry Kissinger', Verso, ISBN1-85984-631-9,http://www.versobooks.com

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Power Elite Public Information Service -http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis - to join/leave list.

Please put in a link to http://www.bilderberg.org - now funded 'til 2003.

PLEASE FORWARD TO NEWSGROUPS AND ANYONE YOU FEEL WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THISINFORMATION.

This is an occasional (max. 1 per month) email list as part of the campaignfor an open press conference at and public awareness of Bilderberg and similarelite meetings.

See http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis for more info.

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ &http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/pepis/messages

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

------------------------------------------------------------------

Marmaduke Hussey, when he was appointed Chair of the Board of govenors ofthe BBC in 1986, lost no time in sacking the director-general. The only troublewas that Alasdair Milne was not a 'croak voiced Dalek' as Dennis Potter laterdescribed robotic stooge BBC managers. Not one bit of it. Alasdair was agifted ex-'Tonight' journalist who had cut his teeth on the satirical show'That Was the Week That Was'.

He didn't harp on about it all the time like the present-day shower, he livededitorial independence.

In his recently published, and laughably titled memoirs, 'Chance GovernsAll', Hussey recalls a conversation he had with Victor Rothschild at TheFamily bank. This was presumably 'New Court', the above-ground H.Q. of N.M.Rothschild and Sons in St. Swithin's Lane EC4.

As a close friend of and adviser to Mrs Thatcher, during a time when theConservative government were being caught out time and again by the BBC,Rothschild was hardly enquiring about power. He was a man with his own malignmission.

-BEGINS-

Victor Rothschild I knew because he was head of the Downing Street ThinkTank [presumably the Central Policy Review Staff or CPRS - ed] If he wantedto enquire about the media, he summoned me. I would then be grilled by himfor two hours, with my replies taken down by my young brother-in-law, WilliamWaldegrave. Pretty intimidating. Victor invited me to an excellent lunchat the family bank. The house wine was delicious, but no mention of the BBC.So with the cheese, I said, 'Now what about the BBC, Victor?'

'How much power have you got?' he asked.

'I'm not sure.'

'Can you fire the Director-General?'

A long pause. 'I think so.'

'Well, that's all that needs to be said, isn't it?'

Typical of Victor - the basic problem as always is power. If you have it,use it. [The same could be said about freedom eh - ed] How you use it isthe problem. Having considered the constitution it was clear to me that thegovernors, if they chose to exercise it, had tremendous power.

-ENDS-

extracted from 'Chance Governs All' A memoir by Marmaduke Hussey, Macmillan,2001

More on the demise of the BBC
The Day Auntie Died? -http://www.bilderberg.org/milne.htm

I'm collecting surnames of the Croak Voiced Daleks at the BBC: Dyke, Hussey,Bland.... coincidence? Anymore whacky 'BBC knobbling' surmames you know of?Contact me at <tony@gaia.org>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

From the archives, this 1994 vintage document has been sitting on my websitesince 1996. It describes a possible scenario for the current tension in Kashmir.Highly questionable authenticity but thought provoking nevertheless in anage of tunnel-vision media.

The population issue is a common misnomer; much of the general public believethere are 'too many people in the world'. In fact this planet could supportit* present population easily if there were equitable distribution of food,wealth and resources.

I suggest a major international figure might step into the breach to avertthis nuclear war in Kashmir. So we all think he's a good guy. [TG]

From Greek magazine: 'Anekshgito' Kostas Kouros, Issue 102, November 1994

Possible Futures: Nuclear War in Kashmir

Adapted from: http://www.bilderberg.org/strigas.htm#From

Mirrors a Greek site: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/8604/strigas.txt

-BEGINS-

Athanasios Strigas, interviewed here, studied Political and Economic Scienceat the University of Heidelberg. He then took Foreign Relations and InternationalStrategy in the University of Georgetown in Washington D.C. and Propagandain Patris Lumumba of Moscow.

He started his career as a diplomatic attaché and nowadays is aspecialised consultant to the supreme military commander of NATO and hasclose connections with the Trilateral Commission. Most of his time is spentin Brussels and in the last year and a half he has published 4 successfulbooks.

Strigas has revealed some shocking facts in Greece about domestic politicsusing secret documents etc. as proof. He also predicted a military crisisbetween Greece and Turkey 18 months before it happened and named exactlythe small island which was the focus of the crisis. Unfortunately his booksare only available in Greek but in them he reveals a great deal about theUS National Security Agency and the Trilateral Commission and the BilderbergClub, sometimes far more than anything you can find on the world-wide web.

This interview is translated, imperfectly, from the original Greek.

Possible Futures: Nuclear War in India

--------------------------------------

* We all know that countries are being guided by their political and militaryleaders. Big countries and small do exist and also the small countries aredependant on the big ones. Despite this in your books you mention twointernational decision making centres which, in your opinion, are above countriesand ideologies. Could you be more specific about that?

* It may sound exaggerated but people these days are being guided by politicaland military leadership according to the orders of two global centres: TheTrilateral Commission and The Bilderberg Club. This marks a new era and itis not something that has happened in the past.

In the past, the world was ruled by ideologies. We know ideologies were usedto control the people. But conflicting ideologies were also creating wars.Therefore, for a while, countries formed alliances.

More recently there has been a change in the global scenery. Everything hasbeen globalised. The world has become a global village. Therefore it needsglobal decision making centres. From this point of view the Planetarchy,if we can call it that, will be the politics of the 21st century. Thismarginalises national governments which are now dependent on those internationalcentres.

Today we see that profit now determines the destinies of countries. The worldis already being ruled by representatives of those two centres. The taskof today's governments is to look after 93% of the international wealth.That is the wealth that those two centres own.

* What exactly are the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission?

* The Bilderberg Club is an international decision making centre named aftera hotel near the Dutch town of Oosterbeek where its first convention tookplace in 1954. Its headquarters is in The Hague in Holland. In its conventionstwo types of people take part we can call the 'protagonists' and the'supernumerary'.

The supernumerary are something like guest speakers, they are only allowedto speak a few minutes and always on the first day of the convention. TheGuidance Committee of the Club protagonists is made up of Americans and Europeansfrom the developed countries, never has a person from the Third World beenon it.

The Club is made up of people with conservative 'aberrations' such as GiovanniAnieli, Luns, Rothschild etc. The Bilderberg Club's president is today JamesCallahan, British ex-prime minister and his assistant is the ex-General Secretaryof NATO, Lord Carrington. Maybe you remember that in 1993 the Club met inGreece, in the Asteras hotel in Bouliagmeni.

The Bilderberg Club today controls 33% of the world's wealth. Some membersof the Bilderberg Club, without having departed from it officially, establishedin June 1973 a new, more powerful group, the Trilateral Commission led byDavid Rockefeller, president of the Chase Manhattan Bank. Members of theTrilateral Commission operate in parallel with but somewhat above the BilderbergClub as a centre of research and analysis. The founding members of the TrilateralCommission are Sirus Vance and Warren Christopher. David Rockefeller is presidentand Zbigniew Brzezinski is chief executive. The Trilateral Commission manages60% of international wealth.

* How do those centres get so much power?

* I think it is obvious that they take the power from the international wealththey control and from the various political appointments, presidents andprime ministers (which are mostly technocrats) which they control and guide.

* But how is possible to select candidates? Do top politicians accept beingonly token leaders of their countries?

* This is a reasonable question but remember, human ambition has no limits.Skilful people exist that do not care for means nor consequences in orderto rise to the top of their country's leadership. The selection for suitableprotagonists to serve the two centres is made after checked information whichanalysts of the NSA [U.S. National Security Agency] have collected, withthe help of organisations such as CIA, DIA and DEA.

The NSA personal reports are transferred in the end to the Steering Committeeof the Bilderberg Club. The Committee meets secretly and the conclusion issealed in a special envelope which is then given to the Bilderberg Club andTrilateral Commission presidents. The presidencies approve the decision almost99% of the time.

Qualifications for candidates are very fluid, [joke?] I mean elasticconsciousness or, if you want, plasticity, to comply with the internationaldecision making philosophy. Another element of control is that they mustnot disturb the global balance. This is essential because this balance hasnothing to do with the balance of the world but simply balance of the globalprofit and loss account. The members must globally ensure the income of thetwo international centres funds.

* But didn't that happen also in the past?

* In the past if someone was a prime minister or a president he would havecome into conflict with the great powers, he would have been characterisedas 'troublemaker' and underminer of liberty and then would have been 'vanished'politically or biologically.

Today the politicians are servants whose masters do not allow them to makeany independent moves. You have seen in the recent German elections (whichhappened at the same time as our [Greek] council elections) that the Frenchwere the ones that were celebrating the victory of Kohl because the Markis supporting the French Franc. The leaders no longer have any freedom. Youlikewise are probably obliged to your friends to take them into considerationin your own moves and plans.

* Could you give us an example?

* Let's imagine that this, or the next, Greek government had the will tosolve the Albanian and Turkish problem and the dispute between Greece andthe former Yugoslavia for Macedonia. What would they do? Just 300 men areenough to invade the Aktio base in Preveza, Western Greece, which belongsto the NSA and then every problem would be solved. If this base were occupiedall communications in the Balkans and Turkey would be paralysed. But sucha move would need much courage.

* What are the methods, groups and structures of the global decision makingcentres?

* The methods that are being used are simple; I promote you as a president,prime minister, military leader; you satisfy your vanity and have ethicaland economical profits. In return you have to blindly obey us. If not wedestroy you by corruption, forced resignation or assassination. At leastthis is what happened up until now.

* What tendencies do you see in those centres today then?

* These days you can see a tendency for renewal. And therefore it was decidedin the last Bilderberg meeting to give the people 2% percent more of theirinternational wealth, something that the old ones did not accept. There areconflicts between conservatives and more liberal types. But I believe thelast will in the end dominate.

* Recently, humanity watched anxiously the collapse of the Soviet Union.Which dynamics led to this collapse and what did it really mean?

* The collapse of the Soviet Union was begun in 1973 by the Trilateral Commissionand part of the Bilderberg Club. The members who left Bilderberg and formedthe Trilateral Commission used shock tactics and have brought the controlof the remains of the Soviet Union to the Bilderberg. This was made possiblebecause in the Summer of 1973, 30 July specifically, The Trilateral Commissioncontrolled 60% of global wealth with their World Bank. So it became the dominatorof the game. The purpose of the Soviet Union's collapse is to demonstrateinternationally the failure of the Communist ideology and present it as asystem that is inhuman.

Besides this, because the population of the earth is growing, the extra 2%that will be given to the people will be granted to the Soviet Union outof the mining of their geological mineral wealth. The soviet people mustbe educated as consuming citizens as in the west. In order to control thosepeople many new countries will be created that will not have constant peace.

* What is the role of the International Monetary Fund?

* The International Monetary Fund is a branch of the World Bank. Today, mostcountries are obliged to borrow money because they cannot get it from privatecapital or from other countries. This necessity occurs either because ofa failure to manage public resources or because the 5 year plan failed orbecause there is internal turmoil etc..

There exist of course also politicians that redeem the sympathy of the peopleby offering them short-term material comforts and asking from them the minimumof their possible efforts. They do this of course with money they take fromthe national budget that should be normally given to development projects.

Anyway, the point is that sometimes countries reach a dead-end. When thishappens the IMF exploits the circ*mstances: it grants a pre-approval of theloan to those countries but with its own conditions. This means that youwill get the loans from the banks (that are all controlled by the World Bank)if you take specified measures which are almost every time anti-social. Thisresults in turmoil in the society. The government panic. In order to calmdown the turmoil even more money must be borrowed.

In this way the government finally gets totally controlled by the IMF.

Let's take for example the Greek education system. 60% of the Education Ministryoutlays are coming from loans of the IMF. So it is not at all odd that fromthe 150.000 kids only 40.000 go to the public universities.

All the above explain also why public works in our country always begin butnever end.

* What are the global decision making centres most afraid of?

* One is the soft spot of the global leaders (even if this sounds impossible)and this lies in their constant fear whether someday the people wake up anddemand the wealth that is rightly theirs. The same happened in the ex-SovietUnion. The NSA had information that some people were leading millions ofsoviets to a revolution in order to get back more than 70 years stolen wealth.They were informed about this movement in time and prevented it by dismemberingthe country.

* You mentioned before an enormous in power organisation, the NSA.

* Yes, that's right. The NSA (National Security Agency) was founded on 4thNovember 1952 by president Truman and its headquarters is at Fort Mead USA.It has more than 2,000,000 agents and scientists all over the world.

There is no committee in Congress, not even any laws that control theiractivities. In reality there is not even an act to affirm its establishment.There exist only documents to protect it.

The security standard is very high and its electronic equipment is unique.It has the most perfect computer centre in the world. Its computers are gatheringand analysing daily all the information from the hundreds of monitoring stationsthat are on the whole planet and in this way they oversee the telecommunicationsof both the friendly and enemy countries. The Greek part of the NSA networkis the American base of Aktio.

It is equipped with scores of satellites which, for example, monitor themovements of the Serbs or of Saddam and in seconds they inform the headquartersof the organisation.

If you ask someone which is the biggest secret service in the world, theymight mention the CIA, DIA or KGB. The NSA has deliberately cultivated theimpression that the secret services of USA that do everything are the CIAand the DIA. Many books and articles have been written about these secretservices. But of the NSA no-one has ever written anything. In reality thebetter known services are executive organs of the NSA which, from its side,is the executive organ of the two global decision making centres that wementioned before; the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commission.

Remember, the NSA manufactures politicians (presidents and prime ministers)always according to the orders of the two global centres. It recruits geniusesfrom all over the world, it is said that it is the inventor of the infectionsof the modern world and of many more things that it is impossible for thesimple human mind to hold.

* How can anyone manufacture politicians?

* You mean well built?!! There is a committee of politician manufacturingwhose president is David Rockefeller with vice president Richard Foren, whois a leading consultant to General Electric. Members of this committee areHenry Kissinger, Alexander Hague, Toshio Nakamura, Edmold Rothschild, JovianniAnielli, Sirus Vans, Charles Duncan (ex-president of Coca- Cola) and HelmutSchmidt.

The politicians that are going to be presidents or prime ministers are approvedor turned down by the above council which meets once a month in the centralbuilding of the NSA.

When the candidate is approved or disapproved the brainwash from the MassMedia begins. Money is given from the Central Banks to help establish a party,campaign etc.. At the same time the other secret services take orders sothat the NSA plan is carried out.

* What do you see in the near future? Will the status quo remain or willthere be changes in the world?

* I think that the changes will begin in the area of Saudi Arabia, changesthat will have an effect on the whole international scene. I predict thefragile balance of the oil cartels will be altered when 3-4 oil wells ofAramco's cartel are bombed. This will mean an increase in the price of petroleumproducts. The cartels for one or two years will have low profits.

If this happens Greece, with its oil, can play a leading role. Here we willhave a repeat of the Onasis phenomenon which was recently made public withall its twisted situations. This time Greece can play a leading role in Europebecause the economic strength of its oil will make it the 3rd power in theEuropean Union. I mean that England will loose its oil wells in the BlackSea, which belong to BP and Shell, at the same time as the coup d'etat inSaudi Arabia. It is very possible that the geographic borders of Greece withTurkey, former Yugoslavia and Albania will change and also the borders ofGermany and Poland (the Oderneisser line).

England will loose Scotland because the Scottish autonomists will blow itsoil wells. After the IRA has made an agreement with England a part of itwill go to support the Scottish Nationalists.

Being under high pressure, and after having passed the economic convulsionwhich will lead to the global shock we mentioned before, the world's economywill make an opening to China. China, of course, will ask for something inreturn. An exchange could be India.

What does this mean? It means that China will be allowed to invade Indiaunder false pretences. The Bilderberg Club will supply India, and the TrilateralCommission will renew the armour of China.

In this war, in order to reduce the world's population, the neutron bombwill be used. One time general of NATO's army, Alexander Hague, was fightingoff proposals for the neutron bomb, so on 29th June 1979 they tried toassassinate him.

If this happens Pakistan and Turkey will be dragged in, and Turkey will splitup in two halves, Eastern and Western part. If this happens Tansu Cillerwill put Turkey in the European Union.

Taking this opportunity I should tell you that within the vast changes thatwill happen in the near future is a step-up of the Ecumenical Patriarchyof Konstantinopolis. I mean that it will play a more important role thantoday. Already Ciller has a draft law ready for the Turkish parliament ifconditions allow it. In this law the Patriarchy will become a separate state,something like the Vatican.

* Except for exploiting the global wealth where else do the two global decisioncentres target? Isn't it a little bit unreasonable to say that a small groupof humans does affect and control almost all the countries on earth? Howdo they manage not to loose control of them?

* Let's make something clear. Everyone that is in either the Bilderberg Clubor in the Trilateral Commission is just a representative of the global cartels.Allied cartels choose some persons to represent them in the above decisionmaking centres. Their opinion for the international trend they favour dependson the cartel they represent. Besides as cartel people the only thing thatthey understand is profit rates. The protagonists in those decision makingcentres just bring gold to the cartels.

Exceptional members such as Rockefeller, Mitsubishi etc. are just brightexceptions or as it was before in the Trilateral Commission Paul Austin theboss of Coca-Cola that was sleeping during all talks and resolutions!

Therefore the Bilderberg Club and Trilateral Commission propose to the peopleof the cartels such as Rockefeller, Hunt etc. the international politicsthat they will follow.

The second part of your question has this answer. In 1963 the Kennedys triedto reduce tension between the USA and the USSR and to stop the war in Vietnam.But the cartels had budgeted that they would collect billions of dollarswith the continuation of the investments in armour and the war. John Kennedyknew that they would kill him. He decided to get sacrificed because of hisillness (an old injury in the back bone which caused horrible pains) andbelieved that they would stop there. They took off the scene also RobertKennedy who would certainly win the next election and would stop the war.Nixon dared to reduce the dispute this means that he did not continue thewar till 1978 but did stop him at 1973. Therefore they involved him in theWatergate scandal and they sent him packing.

So the control and the guidance is in their hands. The two global centresas well as the 'legal' governments also have persons involved in mattersthat have nothing to do with politics. They are bankers, ship-owners,industrialists and higher civil servants. They collect information and transmitit to the centres. There the resolutions and the proposals follow. Afterthe proposals the falldown and as a last solution death.

* How can us humans react to this totalitarianism? What hope is there?

* The only thing that the two global centres are afraid is World Public Opinion.If the citizens of the countries get informed and realise that they are notgoverned by their politicians they will maybe learn to react.

This reaction can take many forms. For example, politicians may refuse towork for specific circles of interests. Then the pressure is obvious. Theydo take it seriously in mind. Then they will play the governments to andfro. Bring the army onto the streets. And when they make sure that thereis no solution the main government committee must be directly summoned todraw up new guide lines. It is obvious that the old main government committeemust resign immediately and a new one must be elected.

* Are there opponent groups that want the people to wake up?

* There are secret groups which came out from the global decision makingcentres themselves. I am paid by NATO to be against monopolies and againstthe big bosses themselves. This luxury allows the fast conversion of othercolleagues or people from the cartels so that they finally get persuadedthat instead of having $1 trillion a year profits, to have something lower.But this small difference can help thousands of families.

A few such persons do exist and act against those two global centres. Oneof them is Oppenheimer the son, that lives now in the eastern part of Moscow.His father lives in the western part. The son Oppenheimer is against thepower structure. He agrees to reduce (very barely of course) his profit rates.His father doesn't.

Let us note here that his father convinced the Bilderberg Club and the TrilateralCommission to bring down Gorbachev who sold Russian diamonds for 468 dollarsa carat. Then he promoted Yeltsin, who sells them for 69,7 dollars a carat.If the people of Russia do not rise up they will have to wait for Oppenheimersdeath, for until then they will not prosper.

-ENDS-

A note sent to me [TG] on Mr Strigas 12May98

---------------------------------------

I have to tell you this about Strigas, since I watched almost all the interviews(I live in Athens) He knows everybody important in Greece. Politicians goafter him (!) to help them for promotion and support by American officials.He HAS many connections abroad and from what he says he knows Stefanopoulos(Clinton's advisor-well known BB) personnaly as a friend. BUT he is almostilliterate, cannot speak Greek properly, makes big mistakes when writingin English (of course some mistakes in supposedly official docs are mistakenon purpose ie false), but all this about universities is bullsh*t. Howeverhe has a relative in NATO or SHAPE in very high position and gets his infofrom there. As far as TC is concerned, he must, according to the reporter,be a last chain of the mechanism. He dresses in expensive and fancy clotheshas lots of money, and has an astonishingly complete database with info onaverybody in Greece!. You get the image. He is a person who does the smalldirty work spreading false info but to make himself credible, he gives awaysome true facts.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Titus Alexander hits the nail on the head with this brilliantly simple proposalthat would begin the process of eroding private corporations' monopoly onour money. The privatised money system is very fragile right now. The gapbetween rich and poor in the UK is at an all time high, the homeless anddamaged begging on the streets and a bogus socialist government in power(smell a Nazi anyone?) Titus' proposal would show how artificially construedall this 'got to tighten your belt' mentality is. The pound could becomethe British peoples' currency again. And the moneymasters would control theeuro not the pound.

As if to prove this point Lord Ahmed, who booked the room for the meetingof the UK Monetary Reform forum mentioned below, was recently in the newscomplaining, quite rightly, about being bugged and phone tapped. Why mightthe government and their advisers have been putting surveillance on a servingpeer? Because they're afraid of his ideas? Or is Lord Ahmed a terrorist aswell now?

Many people believe President Kennedy was assasinated in 1963 because hegot the US treasury to mint Silver Dollars, undermining the privately ownedFederal Reserve Board's monopoly on American money.

If you're new to the money issue the most crucial principle is that the people,through the Treasury, should create and issue money, not the privately ownedand controlled central bank, in the UK case the Bank of England. For morewatch Bill Still's very long but brilliant 'The Moneymasters' video, availablein most international video formats and in broadcast format for TV stationsfromhttp://www.themoneymasters.com[TG]

An Amendment to the Budget Bill

-------------------------------

Titus Alexander<titus.alexander@mcr1.poptel.org.uk>

At the meeting of the Monetary Reform forum in the House of Lords on 12thDecember 2001 Rafiq Manji suggested that we should propose an amendment tothe next budget bill: that the proposed Public Spending Borrowing Requirement(PSBR) of £3billion should be created into existence by the government.

This would be an excellent way of putting the case for non-debt money creationto every single MP, the media, other think tanks and the treasury, takingthe argument from James Robertson's book: CREATING NEW MONEY into the widerpolitical and public arena

It's very important that the argument is presented in a clear and sober way,so that it stimulates MP's and others to want to find out more. I thereforesuggest we prepare

1) a one-line amendment which expresses the essence of the proposal;

2) an A3 folder flier [what's that - ed] setting out the main benefits,mechanisms, potential difficulties and other background information, togetherwirth a reading list.

For example a one-line amendment could be something along the following lines:

"That parliament establish an independent monetary board to issue debt-freemoney to replace borrowing for public spending."

That might be all we need at this stage; even if the government wanted toissue its £3bn PSBR debt-free it would take over a year to set up andwould start after the next election at the earliest:

The point is to get the idea into circulation in such a way that curiouspeople are intrigued enough to want to find out more.

This means that the structure of the argunment we present is critical: clear,brief, sober and relevantr, with enough factual examples pf the potentialbenefits, as well as the costs of the present system.

Extracted from the December issue of Prosperity - freedom from debt slaverynewssheet

http://www.prosperityuk.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------

One thing that has become clear to me through the revelations of MI5whistleblower David Shayler is the extent to which, like the police drugsand vice squads and special branch the Security Services are also in bedwith those they are supposed to be monitoring and, if in the public interest,arresting.

According to Shayler, MI5's 'infiltration' of Class War looks more like a'propping up' operation. Shayler revealed that a Metropolitan Police officerwas recruited to penetrate the organisation. This he did very sucessfully,getting his hands on the membership database rather easily. So successfulwas the spy in fact that he began taking on many of the administrative tasksat Class War. As the jobs nobody wanted to do improved with what was, ineffect, a subsidy to the organisation, memership figures crept higher andhigher and reliability and efficiency of Class War increased dramatically.When the copper was finally pulled out of Class War, largely due to Shayler'sefforts within MI5, the organisation collapsed.

One wonders if the same would happen to the Socialist Workers Party if MI5pulled out of there? The 1999 book 'Defending the Realm, MI5 and the ShaylerAffair' (by Mark Hollingsworth and Nick Fielding) reveals that MI5 recruited25 agents specifically to spy on and penetrate the SWP. The tiny party are,after all, Bolsheviks plotting with the Russians to overthrow the BritishGovernment.

Since then the SWP have become almost as fascist as the labour party whenit comes to insisting members toe the party line. Could it be MI5 have abigger part to play than we thought in creating that party line in the fiorstplace.

So I courteously request MI5 pull their agents out of the SWP. Muy guessis either it would collapse or fall into the hands of true socialists. Iimagine the SS's main reason for not pulling out of the SWP is to preventthe latter.

Any spooks reading this who wish to leak info to me which does not jepoardisenational security (as opposed to the security of a New World 'Festung Europa'Order) but they feel the public should know about...???

You know where I am ;-)

Readit: MI5 and the Shayler Affair, Mark Hollingsworth and Nick Fielding,Andre Deutsch, 1999, ISBN 0-233-99667-2http://www.vci.co.uk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------

The State Department?

Wrong. A private club called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

"The Council on Foreign Relations is the American Branch of a society whichoriginated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should beobliterated and one-world rule established" WITH NO APOLOGIES, SenatorBarry Goldwater

Roundtable is the best informed and balanced CFR criticism sitehttp://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807

E-mail:roundtable@geocities.com [don'tgive up if it bounces!]

Site suck Roundtable to your hard drive now using teleporthttp://www.tenmax.com/teleport/

The Council on Foreign Relations official homepagehttp://www.foreignrelations.org

The Skull and Bones society - occult order closely connected with the CFRhttp://www.parascope.com/articles/0997/skullbones.htm

Foreign Affairs- Journal of the CFRhttp://www.foreignaffairs.org

Use search engines (if you can find a good one) to find up-to-date timelyinfo on the CFR - Possibly the single organisation responsible for more death,pain and squalor than any in history.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------

Evidence is piling up that former US secretary of State and highly paid private'fixer' Henry Kissinger is indeed a war criminal and should be behind bars.Well, he should certainly stand trial, the question should only be whereand when?

Like the Isreali prime minister Kissinger must be getting scared. A dangerouscondition for a cornered beast to be in.

Nobel prize winner and Guatamalan indigenous leader Rigaberta Menchu hasjoined the fight to get Kissinger to face charges.

So what will Kissingers reaction be if, next time he's in London, he is servedwith a subpoena to appear in court to answer war crimes charges? If his reactionwhen this happened in Paris back in May 2001 is anything to go by he won'tlike it. [TG]

See http://www.bilderberg.org/kissing.htm
and http://www.newsnow.co.uk
for the latest on Henry on the run.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Power Elite Public Information Service -http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis - to join/leave list.
Please put in a link to http://www.bilderberg.org - now funded 'til 2003.
PLEASE FORWARD TO NEWSGROUPS AND ANYONE YOU FEEL WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THISINFORMATION.
This is an occasional (max. 1 per month) email list as part of the campaignfor an open press conference at and public awareness of Bilderberg and similarelite meetings.
See http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis for more info.
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ & maybe
http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/pepis/messages
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Introduction
1. War on Terrorism or War on Truth?
2. Lawsuit filed against Kissinger for war crimes
3. September 11th premonition (!)
4. US Government's Terrorist Training Camp - Will We Bomb the USA?
5. Humour: "Come on Mr. Taliban - Turn over Bin Laden"
6. Assasins Versus Crusaders?

Welcome to the latest PEPIS bulletin.

This edition is predictably focussed on the bloodletting currently beingperformed by the USA alliance of one (very few even in the UK military orthe Labour party think this war can achieve anything) in Afghanistan.

Just after the so-called war started I did a revamp of the www.bilderberg.orgwebsite. It now includes pages on information warfare, human genetics, theCIA infiltration of the post-war European Arts scene, interference with mysnailmail, the Bank of International Settlements etc. etc. But don't holdyour breath, just after the last PEPIS was sent out back in August the bilderbergwebsite along with www.mathaba.net was taken out for a day or so.

If this happens again we'll try and sort it out quickly. Please be patientand come back to check it out in an hour or two.

Here's looking forward to the party the day they announce this senselessbombing has stopped.

See http://www.stopwar.org.uk and http://www.mwaw.org for many good antiwarlinks

Tony G

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Power Elite Public Information Service -http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis - to join/leave list.

Please put in a link to http://www.bilderberg.org - now funded for another2 years.

PLEASE FORWARD TO NEWSGROUPS AND ANYONE YOU FEEL WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THISINFORMATION.

This is an occasional (max. 1 per month) email list as part of the campaignfor an open press conference at and public awareness of Bilderberg and similarelite meetings.

See http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm#pepis for more info.

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ &http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/pepis/messages

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Tony Gosling - 31Oct01

The attack on the One World Financial Centre (WTC) was no great surpriseto many of us. It's easy to be wise after the event but a 'spectacular' waspredicted by so-called conspiracy theorists as a pretext for moreinterventionism. In the aftermath why haven't the attacks on Kabul been coveredlive on our TV screens? Why haven't whole sections of the insides of newspapersbeen given over to the ruinous images Afghan photographers are snapping thismorning?

'Self-harming' was planned by the CIA in the sixties to provide a pretextfor the Cuba invasion. (see http://www.bilderberg.org/boneswar.htm#02Mar01) Many believe Kennedy was assasinated for resisting that US military planfor the invasion of Cuba. If Mossad or the CIA sponsored the S11 attack wemay never know because that considerable likelihood cannot be raised. Evendiscussing the possibility might embarass the military in time of war. ACatch 22 to beat them all.

But it's the rejection by the US State Department of the Taliban's offerto hand Bin Laden over for trial in a neutral country that gives the gameaway. The US elite don't want justice. The military, industry and thegeostrategic planners, to justify their own existence, want war. Some mightsay in the curent economic climate they need a war. They treat the worldstage as a poker table. Wher you have to use bluff and up the stakes to survive.

This so-called war has already acted as a convenient cover for the invasionof Palestine by the Isreali army, the dismantling of domestic civil libertiesand countless other totalitarian moves. How convenient that this war hasno specific objective. The military have an endless list of bogey-men thatthey can persue one after another justifying a never-ending war. If we arepassive or cynical enough to let them.

Many of those who died in the twin towers were not in every sense 'innocent'either. Through poverty, starvation, lack of education, IMF Structural AdjustmentProgrammes and sanctions, economic warfare is killing millions of peopleevery year. The World Bank and IMF have been beating the South back intothe stone age for decades now and the financial speculators in the WorldTrade Centre (The One World Financial Centre) must bear some responsibilityfor helping enforce this cowardly New Financial Order of death by debt. Yes,many of those who died in New York were responsible for reinforcing grotesqueopulence in the west and grinding poverty in the South. Spending, that isgambling, vast sums of money on whatever will generate a profit, anywherein the world, regardless of the human consequences.

The problem comes when you realise some of the greatest profits come fromwar. People will borrow any amount of money at any interest rate to fighta war. Financial dealers and bankers think nothing of lining the pocketsof both sides in a conflict especially when the victor honours the debtsof the vanquished.

This 'war on terrorism' is phoney. Most of the world's terrorists are trainedand sponsored by the covert operations arms of western governments. Particularlyembarrassing is the sheer scale of the US terrorist training programme (seearticle below). MI5 whistleblower David Shayler has pointed out the UKgovernment's foreign intelligence arm MI6 launced a (thankfully) botchedattempt to kill Colonel Gadaffi.

Interference by crumbling and sham democracies such as the EU, UK and USAin the affairs of other countries must come under the spotlight. Currentefforts to make the Zimbabwe economy 'scream' and destabilise elections inviteterrorist retaliation. Incidents like the arrest and humiliating trial forwar crimes of democratically elected Serbian President Milosevich also. ExMI6 officer, Richard Tomlinson, revealed MI6 were planning Milisevic'sassassination.

The terrorists in MI6 must be brought to trial before our government startsthrowing its weight around and pontificating on the subject.

Will Henry Kissinger, who ordered the assassination of democratic Chileangeneral Rene Schneider in 1970, be hanging his head like Milosevic as hewalks into the world criminal court? (see http://www.bilderberg.org/kissing.htm) The sooner the better. He's a grave danger to humanity walking the streets(or tearing round the world at breakneck speed) and must be put on trialwithout delay. Why? Because just last night he was keynote speaker at theCentre for Policy Studies in London. One of the primary 'think-tanks' fordeveloping British government policy.

And as the press does its best to untangle the wreckage of the September11th attacks it will do well to examine closely its relations with the I-OPSdepartment of British Military Intelligence.

I-OPS department boasted to whistleblower David Shayler, while he was workingfor MI5, they had 'a spy in every newsroom in Britain'. I-OPS helps vet,unbeknowns to candidates, all employees of the BBC as well as handling 'friendly'reporters and editors such as Dominic Lawson and 'diplomatic' and 'intelligence'correspondants. I-OPS builds up a relationship of trust by feeding reportersexclusive stories from their privileged knowledge of cabinet/military briefsand the intelligence gathered by GCHQ. Real scoops as well as smears arefed to the press. Craving the cudos guillible hacks lap the sweet up withthe sour and regurgitate it all for public consumption.

But these cozy relationships with journalists come into their own in wartimewhen outright lies, designed to bring the public in behind the war and/ortrick the enemy, get presented as fact. And it is precisely in wartime thatjournalists sucked into this I-OPS dance of death, those doing the dirtyon newsroom colleagues who don't support the phoney war, need to search theirconciences. They need to distance themselves by coming clean about wherethey've been tricked in the past and dishing what dirt they know on thosewhose job it is to make sure that the first casualty of war is the truth.

So let's stop boming Kabul right now. This phoney war can only escalate.In the UK we can announce a review of World Bank/IMF programmes and IraqiSanctions by the World Development Movement or similar independent group.Running parallel with a public enquiry into the I-OPS department of UK MilitaryIntelligence.

One final point... If I'm right, and the attacks on the WTC were perpetratedsomewhere within Western Intelligence, watch for British public opinion toswing against this phoney war. It could be time for another 'spectacular'.This time closer to home.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kissinger accused over Chile plot

(Mr Kissinger has denied his involvement)

Tuesday, 11 September, 2001, 02:53 GMT 03:53 UK

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1536000/1536547.stm

A lawsuit has been filed against the former US Secretary of State Henry Kissingerover his alleged role in the death of the former Chilean army commander,General Rene Schneider, in 1970. The suit was filed in Washington by membersof the general's family. They accuse Mr Kissinger of being involved in whatthey say was a US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plot to kill him.GeneralSchneider died after resisting a kidnapping attempt which, the family says,was part of a wider plot to prevent the Chilean Marxist leader, SalvadorAllende, from becoming president.Mr Kissinger has repeatedly denied anyinvolvement in General Schneider's death. The court action follows severalrequests by judges in Chile and Argentina judges to question Mr Kissingerover human rights abuses committed during the military regimes of the 1970s.TheBBC correspondent in Washington says the lawsuit stems from an investigationby a US television network, which claims that CIA communications contradictMr Kissinger's version of events.

Conspiracy

General Schneider's family say the botched kidnapping attempt took placeas part of a covert White House campaign to prevent Socialist Salvador Allendefrom becoming president.

General Pinochet ousted President Allende

Both Mr Kissinger and his boss, the then-president Richard Nixon, were heavilyinvolved in backing anti-Allende factions in Chile, the indictment alleges.

The general was a key player in Chile at the time as he had provided crucialbacking to Mr Allende after his narrow presidential election victory on 4September 1970. In an apparent attempt to remove Mr Allende's military support,coup plotters attempted to kidnap General Schneider, but shot him when hereached for his gun in self-defence. He died two days after the attempt on24 October 1970 in Santiago's Military Hospital. 'No connection'

Mr Kissinger, President Nixon's national security adviser at the time, andlater secretary of state for both Mr Nixon and his successor, Gerald Ford,has always denied his involvement.

Mr Kissinger served under the late former president Nixon

In 1975, a US Senate investigation established that America had indeed backeda coup which eventually brought down Mr Allende three years later, and setup the dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet.However, Mr Kissinger testifiedbefore the Senate hearing that he cut off all support for the coup plottersthe week before General Schneider was murdered.A high-ranking State Departmentofficial referred to previously declassified documents about the situationin Chile during the 1960s and '70s, saying "the documents speak for themselves".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1536000/1536547.stm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These three emails were sent to an email list I'm a member of on the morningof the WTC attacks and before dawn broke in the USA. Presented here inChronological order with email addresses and names concealed where necessary:

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 05:48:13 -0400
From: www@xxxxxxxx.net
To: xxxxx-shadow@xxxxxx.com
Subject: New cool link (Kissinger accused over Chile plot)
Reply-to: xxxxx-shadow@xxxxxx.com

A new link appeared at http://xxxxxx.com/ - 'The last 10 things xxxxxxxxxxxxsaw'

Kissinger accused over Chile plot

Mr. Kissinger, how do you plead?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1536000/1536547.stm

-------------------------------------

To: "'xxxxx-shadow@xxxxxx.com'" <xxxxx-shadow@xxxxxx.com>
Subject: RE: New cool link (Kissinger accused over Chile plot)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:58:17 +0100
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.27650.21)

Also at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7048-2001Sep10.html

(hidden in the Americas/Chile section)

--------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:43:32 +0100
To: xxxxxx@xxxxxx.com
From: Tony Gosling <tony@gaia.org>
Subject: RE: New cool link (Kissinger accused over Chile plot)

Does this mean Kissinger'll have to kick off a nuclear war in Palestine todistract our attention now???

Tony
www.bilderberg.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,583254,00.html

The US has been training terrorists at a camp in Georgia for years - andit's still at it

George Monbiot Tuesday October 30, 2001 The Guardian

"If any government sponsors the outlaws and killers of innocents," GeorgeBush announced on the day he began bombing Afghanistan, "they have becomeoutlaws and murderers themselves. And they will take that lonely path attheir own peril." I'm glad he said "any government", as there's one which,though it has yet to be identified as a sponsor of terrorism, requires hisurgent attention.

For the past 55 years it has been running a terrorist training camp, whosevictims massively outnumber the people killed by the attack on New York,the embassy bombings and the other atrocities laid, rightly or wrongly, atal-Qaida's door. The camp is called the Western Hemisphere Institute forSecurity Cooperation, or Whisc. It is based in Fort Benning, Georgia, andit is funded by Mr Bush's government.

Until January this year, Whisc was called the "School of the Americas", orSOA. Since 1946, SOA has trained more than 60,000 Latin American soldiersand policemen. Among its graduates are many of the continent's most notorioustorturers, mass murderers, dictators and state terrorists. As hundreds ofpages of documentation compiled by the pressure group SOA Watch show, LatinAmerica has been ripped apart by its alumni.

In June this year, Colonel Byron Lima Estrada, once a student at the school,was convicted in Guatemala City of murdering Bishop Juan Gerardi in 1998.Gerardi was killed because he had helped to write a report on the atrocitiescommitted by Guatemala's D-2, the military intelligence agency run by LimaEstrada with the help of two other SOA graduates. D-2 coordinated the"anti-insurgency" campaign which obliterated 448 Mayan Indian villages, andmurdered tens of thousands of their people. Forty per cent of the cabinetministers who served the genocidal regimes of Lucas Garcia, Rios Montt andMejia Victores studied at the School of the Americas.

In 1993, the United Nations truth commission on El Salvador named the armyofficers who had committed the worst atrocities of the civil war. Two-thirdsof them had been trained at the School of the Americas. Among them were RobertoD'Aubuisson, the leader of El Salvador's death squads; the men who killedArchbishop Oscar Romero; and 19 of the 26 soldiers who murdered the Jesuitpriests in 1989. In Chile, the school's graduates ran both Augusto Pinochet'ssecret police and his three principal concentration camps. One of them helpedto murder Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffit in Washington DC in 1976.

Argentina's dictators Roberto Viola and Leopoldo Galtieri, Panama's ManuelNoriega and Omar Torrijos, Peru's Juan Velasco Alvarado and Ecuador's GuillermoRodriguez all benefited from the school's instruction. So did the leaderof the Grupo Colina death squad in Fujimori's Peru; four of the five officerswho ran the infamous Battalion 3-16 in Honduras (which controlled the deathsquads there in the 1980s) and the commander responsible for the 1994 Ocosingomassacre in Mexico.

All this, the school's defenders insist, is ancient history. But SOA graduatesare also involved in the dirty war now being waged, with US support, in Colombia.In 1999 the US State Department's report on human rights named two SOA graduatesas the murderers of the peace commissioner, Alex Lopera. Last year, HumanRights Watch revealed that seven former pupils are running paramilitary groupsthere and have commissioned kidnappings, disappearances, murders and massacres.In February this year an SOA graduate in Colombia was convicted of complicityin the torture and killing of 30 peasants by paramilitaries. The school isnow drawing more of its students from Colombia than from any other country.

The FBI defines terrorism as "violent acts... intended to intimidate or coercea civilian population, influence the policy of a government, or affect theconduct of a government", which is a precise description of the activitiesof SOA's graduates. But how can we be sure that their alma mater has hadany part in this? Well, in 1996, the US government was forced to releaseseven of the school's training manuals. Among other top tips for terrorists,they recommended blackmail, torture, execution and the arrest of witnesses'relatives.

Last year, partly as a result of the campaign run by SOA Watch, several UScongressmen tried to shut the school down. They were defeated by 10 votes.Instead, the House of Representatives voted to close it and then immediatelyreopen it under a different name. So, just as Windscale turned into Sellafieldin the hope of parrying public memory, the School of the Americas washedits hands of the past by renaming itself Whisc. As the school's Colonel MarkMorgan informed the Department of Defense just before the vote in Congress:"Some of your bosses have told us that they can't support anything with thename 'School of the Americas' on it. Our proposal addresses this concern.It changes the name." Paul Coverdell, the Georgia senator who had foughtto save the school, told the papers that the changes were "basically cosmetic".

But visit Whisc's website and you'll see that the School of the Americashas been all but excised from the record. Even the page marked "History"fails to mention it. Whisc's courses, it tells us, "cover a broad spectrumof relevant areas, such as operational planning for peace operations; disasterrelief; civil-military operations; tactical planning and execution of counterdrug operations".

Several pages describe its human rights initiatives. But, though they accountfor almost the entire training programme, combat and commando techniques,counter-insurgency and interrogation aren't mentioned. Nor is the fact thatWhisc's "peace" and "human rights" options were also offered by SOA in thehope of appeasing Congress and preserving its budget: but hardly any of thestudents chose to take them.

We can't expect this terrorist training camp to reform itself: after all,it refuses even to acknowledge that it has a past, let alone to learn fromit. So, given that the evidence linking the school to continuing atrocitiesin Latin America is rather stronger than the evidence linking the al-Qaidatraining camps to the attack on New York, what should we do about the"evil-doers" in Fort Benning, Georgia?

Well, we could urge our governments to apply full diplomatic pressure, andto seek the extradition of the school's commanders for trial on charges ofcomplicity in crimes against humanity. Alternatively, we could demand thatour governments attack the United States, bombing its military installations,cities and airports in the hope of overthrowing its unelected governmentand replacing it with a new administration overseen by the UN. In case thisproposal proves unpopular with the American people, we could win their heartsand minds by dropping naan bread and dried curry in plastic bags stampedwith the Afghan flag.

You object that this prescription is ridiculous, and I agree. But try asI might, I cannot see the moral difference between this course of actionand the war now being waged in Afghanistan.

www.monbiot.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a flash movie - you may need to download a plugin for your browser- don't bother if you haven't got a sound card though.

I was a bit worried by the 'Bin Laden, nowhere to run, nowhere to hide' atthe end of this short movie - but the overall sentiment I totally agree with.

http://yonkis.ya.com/imagenes5/guerra/talibamm.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information here on The Assassins, The Crusaders and the parallels withthe current demonising of 'Moslem Fundamentalism' is too spooky to ignore.....

http://www.enterprisemission.com/tower2.htm